Greetings brethren, friends and neighbors,
I have recently changed email service providers and am in the process of incorporating old email subscribers with the newer subscribers to the Nicholas Scrolls. If you have not received any Scrolls in a long while, I apologize for the inconvenience - it was not my intention to leave you out of the loop. My new webministry address is http://nicholas-scrolls.com If you have received this email and no longer wish to be a participant in this ministry, please reply to this Scroll requesting to be unsubscribed. If you wish to stay aboard with me, I am grateful for your fellowship and if you have missed out on any prior Scrolls over the last few months, please visit my website and click on the Scrolls archive link to access all past Scrolls. Thank you for your patience and understanding during this period of change and upgrade. You may still contact me directly at my old email address svshalom@earthlink.net for any personal correspondance and/or ministry related dialogue.

I have written extensively in prior scrolls what it means to "come out from among them." I recently received this wonderful article penned by Ron and Karen Schwartz discussing more elaborately the difficulties many of us experience in making a separation from mainstream Christianity. I relied on mostly New Testament remedy and example but Ron and Karen have taken it a step further. They have accurately supported the concept of necessary separation with Old Testament witness and have eloquently married it with the same expectations found in the New Testament. Their article is a powerful witness in and of itself. I discovered some of my own difficulties described herein and was moved to reply to their findings, which I include later in this Scroll.
Due to the length of this article, I will attempt to keep my own comments and analysis to a minimum. The following is part one of two and God willing - I plan to incorporate their "part two" in the following Scroll. Since this Scroll is dedicated to their witness of Christ-like understanding and discernment followed by my own witness, I decided to dedicate this two part series to the Body and call it; "That Which Every Joint Supplieth."

By The Rivers Of Babylon
Part 1. What It Means to "Come Out"

February 12, 2007
Ron and Karen Schwartz
Many people who have left institutional churches have been asking, "What now?" Let's consider some of the issues they must address if they are to go on.
Ps 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

The story of Israel's captivity to Babylon is both promising and tragic. It is a story of two groups of people. One group (let's call them the "castaways ") was carried into bondage in Babylon and longed to return. The other group (let's call them the "squatters ") lived in the ruins of the great city, Jerusalem, but made no effort to rebuild it. Let's examine both the castaways and the squatters and understand how their example is applicable for us today.

The Castaways: Finding Paradise

Nehemiah 1:3-4 KJV
3 And they said unto me, The remnant that are left of the captivity there in the province are in great affliction and reproach: the wall of Jerusalem also is broken down, and the gates thereof are burned with fire.
4 And it came to pass, when I heard these words, that I sat down and wept, and mourned certain days, and fasted, and prayed before the God of heaven

Prior to the captivity in Babylon, the Israelites spoke and wrote in their native Hebrew tongue. But during their captivity in Babylon, Persia conquered Babylon and brought with it their national language. The Jewish population was forced to adopt it. Only a small fragment of the Jewish population retained knowledge of the Hebrew language. Therefore, coming out of Babylon, Israel had a new national language: Aramaic.

It wasn't just their language that was affected. Following their captivity in Babylon, Israel organized into family clans rather than into the original twelve tribes. The organization of their nation was not structured as it was before. Their captivity affected them in many ways (culturally as well as linguistically). Merely leaving Babylon did not remove the influence of Babylon . The influence of Babylon was felt in Israel for centuries that followed.

Like the Jews in Babylon who "sat down, [and] wept, when [they] remembered Zion, " many Christians today look back to the first generation church with great fondness. Many have left "their" Babylon but don't know how to get their Zion back. Many eventually end up imitating first generation practices without understanding them. Some try to keep Jewish customs, some imitate early church methods, and some even imitate spiritual gifts and ministry (this is NOT to say that gifts and ministry don't exist). But like Jerusalem after the captivity, the church of the book of Acts is gone. All that remains of this once great city (i.e., the church of the book of Acts) are collapsed walls and a burned down city.

"Come Out Of Her"

Revelation 18:2-4 KJV
2 And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her , my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

There is a call today for God's people to come out of institutional churches. It will eventually become known as the Post-Modern Church Exodus: a time when Christians gave up on the empty promises and hypocrisy of the institutional church. But there is a problem with merely leaving these churches. Leaving does not really change anything unless there is a subsequent change of the heart. It is a geographical change but not necessarily a spiritual one. It is one thing to come out of Babylon and quite another to get Babylon out of you. The calling to "come out " is not simply about leaving institutional churches. It's about leaving behind the ideas, the culture, and the influences found there. You cannot simply leave an institutional church and be free of its influence. Its influence will try to follow you the rest of your life.

Jerusalem didn't lie at the city limits of Babylon. In other words, stepping out of Babylon didn't place the Jews in Jerusalem. The road from Babylon to Jerusalem was long and difficult. Then once they arrived at Jerusalem, they had a whole new set of issues to address. It is the same with Christians who "come out" of their own Babylon. They must face and overcome many obstacles if they are ever to enjoy the true freedom of coming out.
Let's consider some of the obstacles.

Spiritually Defective

Romans 7:15, 19 KJV
15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Matthews 12:35 KJV
35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.
Genesis 1:25KJV
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind and cattle after their kind and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

There is a spiritual principle set forth in these scriptures: things reproduce after their own kind. What you are, what you become, and what you reproduce will be a reflection of your heart. We know many groups that began as either a Bible study or home church. Bible studies are especially effective because people don't realize that they are actually participating in something that is closer to a real church than the place they go to on Sunday and call "church." Quite often, Bible studies grow to the point where people recognize that a church has formed. It is at that point that people tend toward "the evil which I would not, that I do. " In other words, we reproduce after our kind. Believing that we are actually involved in the establishing of something new, we actually reproduce the same church culture from which we came: a building, barn, or lease space is dedicated for the purpose of church, pews or chairs are aligned for an audience, officials are appointed, and with great expectation for growth, a "new and improved" church is opened for business. This is a weekly occurrence in cities, states, provinces, and countries all around the world. But the problem is that it is not new and improved. It is the same old thing with a different label.

There is no magic in leaving an institutional church. It does not change you. In fact, the greatest danger facing people who leave institutional churches is the very real probability that they will inevitably reproduce the same type of institution as that from which they came. We cannot stress this enough. Many people have left an institutional church and either joined or started a new one and then watched as the new church evolved into an institutional church. Why? It is because in their hearts they never left Babylon. They're still living there.

Spiritually Broken

Psalms 31:11-14 KJV
11 I was a reproach among all mine enemies, but especially among my neighbors and a fear to mine acquaintance: they that did see me without fled from me.
12 I am forgotten as a dead man out of mind: I am like a broken vessel.
13 For I have heard the slander of many: fear was on every side: while they took counsel together against me, they devised to take away my life.
14 But I trusted in thee, O LORD: I said, Thou art my God.

Many people leave institutional churches under less than favorable conditions. If you are going to leave, it is best just to leave. Many people feel the need to talk with the pastor and present their case. The problem here is that most pastors see this effort to communicate as a personal attack, and so they respond in kind. As a result, many people leave with deep hurts and bitterness, and many tend to develop rebellious and antagonistic characteristics. They may leave their church geographically, but they retain deep spiritual issues because of the trauma they experienced when leaving.

We are not saying not to leave; we are saying take care in how you leave.
As a result, we now have masses of "un-churched" wounded cluttering our nations. Many of these walking wounded believe themselves to be overcomers (i.e., those who have come out of Babylon). Most, however, are merely victims of the contemporary church system, not an unstructured band of overcomers. If their emotional and spiritual issues are not addressed, one thing is certain: they will never be able to appreciate the freedom for which they hope, and many may end up in a worse spiritual condition than before they left.

The lack of conformity is usually the first indication that a person is hearing the calling in the Spirit to leave an institutional church. Sometimes Christians are not even aware that they are not conforming. Things take place or are taught that they don't agree with but usually they say nothing because they don't wish to rock the boat (at least at first). But at some point, others begin to sense their disagreements and the problems begin, especially if one of these "others" includes the pastor. Disagreements always get back to the pastor. One's lack of conformity is often viewed as rebellion and sometimes-even insurrection. When this happens, many pastors first attempt to force him back into conformity through manipulation, but when that doesn't work, they victimize (or at least marginalize) the non-conformist by making wild accusations against him, and few in the church seems to recognize how wild the accusations really are.

Most of the time, the emotional and spiritual damage done to one who leaves (or considers leaving) a church is deliberate. Often, pastors and/or other church leaders seek to inflict spiritual misery upon him, victimize him. Stories circulate about his "rebellion." He may even be falsely accused of "slandering" the church, its members, and especially the pastor. When someone is victimized like this, he may try to defend himself by striking back in anger and then his credibility is damaged or destroyed. Friends and acquaintances begin to see him as the rebel the pastor accuses him of being, and they are forced to choose sides. Much to his surprise, his friends almost always choose the pastor's side (at least in public). The pastor wins by poisoning the minds of his friends and sometimes even his family.

Even though he was originally contemplating leaving, now he no longer wishes to go. He wants to stay to clear his name and to prove he is right. Except now the pastor wants him gone. So the person is forced to leave, usually in shame and/or anger that eventually gives way to bitterness.

This cycle is repeated over and over again, in greater and greater frequency, in churches all across our world. We have heard story after story, and they all follow a similar story line. It is not that Christians today are more "rebellious" than those of previous generations; it's just that more and more Christians, in greater and greater numbers, are hearing the call of the Spirit to "come out" and are victimized when they obey.

Most Christians do not intend to cause the problems with their churches even though this seems to be the inevitable outcome. They simply feel obligated to go to their pastor in good faith to explain why they are leaving. Many Christians will use some excuse like school or family so that it does not appear that they are attacking the church or its pastor. This form of "little white lie (tongue-in-cheek)" will oftentimes afford them the opportunity to leave in peace. Other Christians are too naïve and tell the truth. They are just as naïve when they are eventually defaced before their friends. There are many reasons why wounded Christians now clutter the realms of the "un-churched," but no one disputes the fact that there is a steady trickle and sometimes a heavy stream of people flowing out from institutional churches.

So, if you are hurt in such a way, what should you do?

First of all, it is important to acknowledge that you are hurt or spiritually broken. Just because you may see the problems with an institutional church does not mean that you now have all the answers. You more than likely have wounds. If a church has hurt you, it is important that the first thing you find is healing. Quit responding to the hurt. This means no phone calls, no e-mail, and no sidebar conversations with your friends about what happened to you. It will only keep the wound open. So don't respond to the things you hear. Let them go. Don't keep the cycle continuing. Find a place alone with God where you can find healing that can only come from His Spirit. It will not happen overnight. This type of healing usually takes months. In the meantime, don't continue discussing your hurt.

You must never conclude that just because you left your institutional church, you now have all the answers. An open wound may poison your answers. Therefore, if you are still wounded or spiritually broken, you have not fully "come out." You may be out geographically, but until you find true and complete healing, the institutional church has not yet come out of you.

Spiritually Defiant (Liberty)

Many people who leave the institutional church go through an awakening. It is like scales falling from their eyes. Suddenly they can see. These people must carefully guard themselves against false revelation. It can come in many different forms. One of the most powerful is that of spiritual liberty.
The revelation of religious bondage sometimes has a strong impact upon people. The conformity and compromise that they have long engaged in is suddenly revealed for what it really is; religious hypocrisy. Even though it is completely unfair to assume that others who appear like them have the same hypocritical motives, Christians who have had this kind of awakening tend to assume that all others who appear to be like they were are just as fake. This is not always the case. There are many Christians who appear wrapped in superficial religious form but are actually very sincere.

It is also not uncommon for Christians who experience this sort of awakening to mistake all forms of restraint and discipline as superficial religious form, compromise, and conformity. Sometimes this is a result of their being so rigidly oppressed and controlled by religion that they fly, like a spring suddenly being released, to the opposite extreme, rejecting almost everything that has even the appearance of restraint or control. But this extreme is just as wrong as religious conformity and compromise. It is just at the other extreme. Peter described this behavior when he wrote, " As free, and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but as the servants of God (1 Peter 2:16)."

People who go to the other extreme (complete lack of restraint and control) are guilty of throwing the baby out with the bath water. They confuse the ability to sin with spiritual liberty. But spiritual liberty does not provide license to sin. Those who really understand spiritual liberty understand that it is NOT about the freedom to indulge oneself but freedom from obeying the indulgences of life. It frees us to live in the Spirit as opposed to living in self-indulgence, and it also frees us from condemning those who do not believe as we do. True spiritual liberty is liberty from sin, NOT the freedom to commit it.

People who confuse spiritual liberty see two extremes. It's like a number line. At one end of the line is superficial religious form and hypocrisy. At the other end is the rejection of control and restraint (indulgence). They are two extremes of the same line, the line of religious hypocrisy. Spiritual liberty, when practiced as either extreme, is nothing more than another form of bondage. Both of these extremes are wrong. You can be in bondage to superficial religious conformity just as you can be in bondage to self-indulgence. We must understand that self-indulgence is rebellion against the Holy Spirit.

The deception of spiritual liberty is just another way of sidetracking people from coming out of Babylon. It keeps people trapped - either to religious conformity or to the lack of self-restraint. The Holy Spirit does not lead people in either direction. The Spirit is first of all holy and will never cause you to condemn others or to attempt forced conformity. Jesus modeled true spiritual liberty when He said to the woman caught in the act of adultery, "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more (John 8:11)."

The Squatters: Replacing Paradise

Nehemiah 1:3-4, 2:10 KJV
3 And they said unto me, The remnant that are left of the captivity there in the province are in great affliction and reproach: the wall of Jerusalem also is broken down, and the gates thereof are burned with fire.
4 And it came to pass, when I heard these words, that I sat down and wept, and mourned certain days, and fasted, and prayed before the God of heaven.
2:10 When Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobiah the servant, the Ammonite, heard of it, it grieved them exceedingly that there was come a man to seek the welfare of the children of Israel.

Like the Jews who left Babylon to go back to what a previous generation had known, most of those coming out of institutional churches want to go back to what the original apostles had. They want to experience a true New Testament church. But just as Jerusalem lay in ruins then, the church described in the New Testament appears to no longer be around. Sadly though, many coming out of today's institutional churches have been falsely mislead into believing that having a New Testament church is as easy as leaving the church they are in. Christians leaving these churches will face the same problem faced by the Jews who came out of Babylon: Jerusalem no longer exists. It has long since been torn down. You cannot open up the phone book and find a New Testament church simply because these words are in its name. It is just not that easy. There are many cheap imitations with very little substance.

Another problem the Jews faced in their return is that there were already people there who had lived in Jerusalem throughout the captivity and claimed squatter's rights. We see the same thing today. There are groups around that have coined phases like "Five-Fold Ministry," "New Testament Church," "End Time Movement," "Covenant," etc. They use New Testament nomenclatures but are usually New Testament in name only. They claim to be building the New Testament Church, but all they really do is sit in the ruins. They have been around for decades and churn out the same endless dialogue year after year while delivering nothing. They claim to have apostles but they are typically all talk with very little power. They claim to have prophets, but these also speak in platitudes and generalities, simply reiterating what everyone already believes. It is entertaining and always draws a crowd. They are at best a distraction, causing many to join in their hype and believe that they are part of something great.

But in truth they are little more than a TV reality show. At worst, some are outright liars and counterfeits, pompously strutting about claiming their apostolic authority and demanding preeminence. They imitate spiritual gifts while what they really seek is fame, fortune, and power. And they will fight for "their" territory. They do little or nothing to rebuild the city themselves while hindering anyone who does try to rebuild it. These are squatters , who sit in the ruins of the New Testament church and claim it as their own. Sadly, there are "un-churched" people who are "called out" of these groups as well, only to bring the same counterfeit behavior into the home church movement. This is why it is important to not just leave the institutional churches but to get it out of you.
How will you know the squatters?

They prefer to sit in the ruins rather than rebuild. If a church claims to be a New Testament church yet has pastor(s)/ leader(s)/ apostle(s)/ prophet(s)/ whoever/ whatever/ etc. who exercise rule and/or control over everyone else, it is a fake. It is merely a squatter . True ministers of God seek to rebuild the city (the people) of God. This means that all people will have opportunity to grow off the milk and become mature adults in the Lord (elders) who become peers with all those who exercise oversight over new converts. True New Testament leaders do not exercise oversight cart blanche over all of the believers in their churches.

"Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobiah" were squatters in Jerusalem, and they were only interested in what was beneficial to them. It is the same with New Testament squatters . They will participate in something as long as it grows, develops, and spreads their ministry. It must grow the church under them, not over them or over there. In determining whether to involve themselves in something, they will look for how it advances their influence. True godly leaders will be hard to distinguish from among the other spiritually mature believers (true elders). They make no effort to identify or magnify themselves. And because of their efforts to restore the city (God's people), there will be a large and/or growing number of spiritually mature believers. Remember, just as "Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobiah " were enemies to the work of God, so are today's New Testament squatters.
Conclusion
There is no question that there is a call in the Spirit to come out of the contemporary institutional church that is incontrovertibly a Babylonian system. But physically leaving is the easy part. Unless we identify and remove all the ways that the Babylonian culture has influenced us spiritually, culturally, and emotionally, we will never be completely out of her. Until we expel her completely, Babylon will always be a part of us.
We have heard many stories from people who have come out of institutional churches and been a part of starting something new just to see that new church end up becoming just like the institutional church they left. Why, they always ask? The answer is simple. They never really left. They took the church with them and then recreated what was in their heart.

Perhaps it is too late for us. Perhaps the influence of Babylon is so much a part of us that we can never really be completely free of it. Remember, following the Civil War, the slaves were set free. However, slavery was so much a part of them that leaving slavery was not that easy. It had come to define them mentally, socially, culturally, and emotionally. Therefore, even though they were "out" of slavery, they continued to live like slaves. Think about how this pertains to those who have "come out" of contemporary institutional churches. Has the institutional church come out of them or do they continue to function with the mindset of an institutional church? You will find that the latter is normally the case.

Some say it takes between one and three generations to change a culture. Perhaps it is not our generation that can change our culture and see the "true" rebuilding of Jerusalem. Perhaps it will be our children or our grandchildren. Perhaps the best thing we can do is to protect our children from being brought up in the same "Churchianity" pollution that we were brought up in. Perhaps the best thing we can do is to shield them from the inhibition, conformity, and religious hypocrisy that we fled.

We must be brave. We must drive out the squatters who are merely New Testament counterfeits. We must honestly assess ourselves and recognize the influence of Babylon in us. You want an objective view. Ask your children. Ask those who have not been spoiled by the influence of Babylon. And let's pray that we do not spoil our children with the Babylon that is still in us.
Lord willing part 2 will follow shortly and will address the cultural issues of this problem.
Amen.
kmsrjs@triton.net

Encouraging One Another in Love

Hoping to add a "little" for a greater fullness of understanding, I responded to Ron and Karen with the following:
I must compliment you on this particular article. I found it to be one of the most impressive articles you've written to date as well as the most crucial to our understanding today's dilemma. While I was reading with great interest, I discovered familiar patterns within, which I experienced myself over the course of my separation from mainstream institutionalized religion. It almost seemed that I was one of the subjects of your study in analyzing the problems associated with "coming out from among them." I concur with your analysis that much of what you have said is absolutely true and at one time considered myself "damaged merchandise" by how I was treated within the organized Christian sect. My love for God however never failed me and is what kept me searching for deeper understanding, resolve, commitment and obedience to my Father's will.

My own journey at times has seemed lonely and I have been misunderstood by many mainstream Christians who know only their contemporary application of being churched by paid clergy. Few it seems ever truly understand the essence of the early Church unless they too experienced the promised suffering and persecution afforded those who choose to disciple after Christ. You are absolutely correct that separating from one Church often times only begets another of the same kind. I've seen it and tasted it within cell groups. What many do after making a separation is follow the only paradigm they're familiar with - adhering to the style and practices they were accustomed to in their contemporary Church experiences. It seems that they know no different.

It seems to me that your article was lacking a bit in providing remedy. Perhaps your follow-up article will address such - that remains to be seen. I think it is fair to say that they're is no catch all remedy because each person deals with the promised adversity differently during their "awakening." In my case, I found that initially it was extremely helpful to discuss issues and problems associated with my Church experience within a trusted group of brethren. It has been my experience that such a group acted much like a support group and all of us shared in some of the same difficulties. This did not have the effect of keeping the wounds open as you say but by researching the Word together and discussing intimately the resolve, courage and remedy afforded us in the biblical examples, many of us - not all, were able to move forward in developing a closer relationship with God. Some went on to find less offensive Church groups that supported the idea of personal relationship with God and others went back to "wallowing in the mire" never able to grasp the grace made available to those who must accept the circumstances of promised suffering.

As for myself, I changed course 180 degrees to pursue a life of discipleship and witness that was absent of partiality and hypocrisy seeking only to allow the Word of God to remain my test, judge and measuring rod. I soon realized that wherever I went with the "mindset" of a contemporary disciple, the real church would follow. I truly believe in and bear witness to the Spirit's indwelling presence and conviction. I was led out of - then comforted and "trained" during a long period of repentance and then led into a life of sincere discipleship. My daily witness is anything but routine and is unstructured for the most part. I later discovered and was afforded the opportunity to expand my hearts desire of fellowship and ministry to the Internet. Many more souls can be reached and overhead expense is nominal compared to the more formal alternatives. So, like you, the Internet is a formidable vehicle to getting the Word out and for sharing my ongoing witness and testimony.

Your articles and deep insights are edifying for a person like myself and they further add checks and balances to my own understanding and application. Others have made similar statements about the Scrolls and Exhortations I publish. I think that God uses us both as fellow workers in the same fields of harvest. But if we're to continue seeking out our brethren sharing our insights and testimony and encourage Godly fellowship - we must be allowed to continue sharing our whole witness. That is to say, keep telling the whole story of how Christ delivered us and made us more useful in ministering the true attributes of grace, liberty, justice, faith, hope and love. This means that by continuing to share the whole story, we will be better able to identify and locate our Lord's lost sheep because many have shared the same trouble within organized religion. You are right that many who came out are wandering in the masses of the unchurched and it is they whom I seek.

I do not propose anything more structured than to make known our own whereabouts and contact information so that fellowship can continue and our love for Christ and our brethren will continue to manifest itself. Following New Testament principles also means that we must safeguard ourselves from hungry wolves and make certain that all who participate understand how to do so. That means that we must continue to make the distinction between ourselves and what the institutionalized kind represent. Paul warned us to not disassociate ourselves with the world but to remove ourselves from the company of so-called brethren. And this we must continue to do but not at the risk of forsaking our gathering together. Website Ministry does indeed help us to fulfill that objective. That is, at least in part, the type of remedy I offer my scattered brethren. Beyond that - God provides the example and pattern we all should be following - the selfless pattern of Christ Jesus. What makes this kind of fellowship better than a home group is that we are somewhat absent of our flesh in cyberspace and the normal routines of religious worship and patterns of Churchianity are non existent. We are simply sharing the Word and expressing words of wisdom and testimony among ourselves.

I am so moved by this article that I was compelled to share it with all of you so that others may be encouraged by our combined insights, witness and testimony. This article explains well the problems associated with making a necessary separation and my hope is that by re-publishing it in this format - we are reaching out and touching others who are still looking for safe fellowship and relationship with God. Ministries like ours help to fill certain voids created when separation from man's church occurs. It is my hope always that the people whose lives we touch and inspire are led into more meaningful and useful relationships with God. There is nothing He cannot achieve through us but we must always be willing participants surrendered to doing our Father's will as sons and daughters to Him. Jesus was our example in human flesh and the Father commands, "Listen to Him."

I finished my letter to Ron and Karen expressing my prayerful wishes that our Lord continues to bless them both richly with His wisdom and grace. To all who read this I say, their part in the mission field is no less important than any other and they both remain an encouragement to me. Theirs is probably the best contemporary example I could point to in what it means to "tend the lambs" and "feed His sheep." Their love abounds for the brethren - of that, I have no doubt! AMEN

Ron replies with a kind acknowledgement saying, " I have no doubt that there are gaps in my notes. This is how it's supposed to be. We understand "in part" and we prophesy "in part." We all have a "part." But if you get enough "parts" together you just might be able to see the complete message. I typically stay away from anyone who acts like or claims to know it all. Feel free to include with my note, "this is the portion of the message from Ron and Karen, and this is the portion I received." Our message should complete and compliment each other. Any other way and it is not "that which every joint supplieth."

Ron blessed me and was complimentary in his acknowledgement. But more than that - Ron and Karen blessed us all with a compassionate understanding affording each of us hope that none of us are alone and many of us share in the same adversity and various persecutions. When we reach out and share with one another like this, we establish fellowship and are free to practice and share our love for the brethren. This is the greatest benefit to our fellowship and is no less important than the Wise men teaching and the Prophets prophesying or reading from the Scribes Scrolls things new and old. In so doing, each of us becomes a part in supplying the whole - the Body of Christ.

Lastly, as it relates to being separate, The Jews were called a holy people, because they were separated unto God, to be a religious and consecrated people. Christians, as a body, are also called to be holy, because they are in like manner supposed to be separated unto Christ. The Bible is called Holy because it is the immutable, unchanging and eternal Word of God. There is no greater authority on earth defining righteousness, justice, truth, faith hope and love. Nothing man creates or postulates can ever compete with the eternal and unchanging nature of God's Word. It is as separate from the Worldly as we are called to be - a Holy people separated unto God. AMEN

With all sincerity and love for the truth and our scattered brethren abroad,

Nicholas A. Stivers, a humbled God fearing man-disciple, scribe and messenger.
Author; Apostasy Revealed published 2003 by Mountainview Publishing ISBN: 1-928602-92-4
http://nicholas-scrolls.com
http://abide-in-truth-events.cephasministry.com/
http://cephasministry.com